berkus_ventures_300ppi copy

Berkonomics

Do you agree with “Fail fast?”

Here’s a question that should strike close to home. Professional investors like to quote this mantra to anyone who will listen.  “Fail fast,” they say. But what if you believe so strongly in your budding enterprise that this seems to be the most ill-advised directive you’ve ever heard?

So here are some rules that might make it clearer for you and for those who so easily quote the mantra.

Rules to consider as tests of early success.

With the first round of funding, there should be agreed-upon milestones to be achieved.  If they are not achieved within the expected time, the reasons must be analyzed by you and by your board and acted upon to avoid loss of capital beyond plan or expectation.

If you discover and become convinced that your vision is flawed, or the product impossible to create within cost and time expectations, or the demand impossible to quantify, or revenues never close to plan, then it would certainly be time to rethink the plan and product.

Could you pivot to save the company?

Could you and your team pivot if given the time and runway to do that?  Would that restart the clock, putting even more pressure upon you to perform?  Your investors know that an excellent management team is perhaps the greatest asset for any company – because it is just this team that has historically been able to make a drastic alteration of the plan, ultimately making a failing vision into a wildly successful one.

[Email readers, continue here…] But if neither great management nor your vision for the product shows real signs of success in the market, then it may surely be time to listen to the investors and perhaps the board. Fail fast! Reduce further expenditures of remaining capital and protect the assets purchased with the original investment.

A personal story of failing fast

My favorite story of a fast failure was of a technology incubator started in the year 2000 with optimistic money from several angel investors, including me.  Within a month after the tech crash, the founder of the incubator decided that it made no sense to incubate companies that were not likely to receive new investments soon following incubation in the winter-of-cash that followed the tech crash.  He volunteered to close the incubator, and he returned 96% of our investments to all of us angel investors.  (That return proved to be the best investment return any of us saw in the several years that followed.)

Is it the end of your entrepreneurial world to fail quickly?

Half of all professionally managed venture capital or angel investments fail.  There should be no shame to the entrepreneur in admitting such a failure.  Some angel and VC investors will give special credit to those entrepreneurs who have experienced failures when investing in their next effort.  The lessons learned are difficult to teach and are great assets in the next effort.

There is little shame and quite a reputational boost in acknowledging a failing plan and “failing fast.”

Images created using DALL-e (MS Designer) using prompt: “A realistic photo image of workers dismantling a small office with the young, male entrepreneur looking on in dismay. Ragged edges all four sides.”

  • Michael O'Daniel

    Questions:

    I thought the failure rate for VC- or angel-backed companies was much higher than 50%. Does the qualification “managed by professionally managed… ” lower the failure rate?

    How many VCs or angel investors are likely to fund a startup in the first place if it is managed by the founder(s) as opposed to professional mangement?

    • Dave Berkus

      Michael,
      If 2.5% of applicants to angel groups receive investment and 2.5% of those receive VC rounds, and if VCs often replace the founders while angels do not, then I believe these numbers to be close, even if an estimate.
      – Dave

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share

Sign up for
Dave's weekly emails

Most Recent Posts

Category

Skip to content